For a long time, Indigenous peoples were portrayed only as vulnerable populations in the face of these crises. However, recent research shows something different: Indigenous peoples are not only resisting destruction, but also producing concrete alternatives to regenerate territories, restore ecological relationships, and build sustainable ways of living.
How was land actually assigned to families? Did the fascist administration follow the technical rules it claimed to use, or was the allocation of land shaped by other practical and administrative factors?
The global climate crisis requires not only new technologies but also a deep reflection on who drives the economy: the worker.
In many parts of the world, mining is presented as a pathway to economic growth. It generates exports, public revenue, and jobs, and often makes some municipalities appear “wealthy” in official statistics. But what happens when this wealth does not translate into better living conditions for the people who live in mining territories?
It is important to distinguish between inequality as such and inequality that becomes destabilizing. A certain degree of economic and wealth differentiation is inherent to market economies and can, under appropriate institutional conditions, enhance efficiency.
If the purpose of the economy is misaligned, economics has very little to add. Technical fixes cannot heal a system that no longer knows why it exists.
The report Resisting the Rule of the Rich, published by Oxfam, provides an important diagnosis of the current phase of global capitalism.
This short paper builds upon the recent work by Jennifer Nedelsky and Tom Malleson, titled Part-Time for All: A Care Manifesto. The authors present a strong case for reimagining modern societies with a focus on care norms and practices. Care is intrinsically valuable and should not be exclusively linked to gender or perceived merely as a secondary concern in relation to work.
In a societal context where companies are expected to address wicked problems, this article advocates for advancing marketing communication-actions to promote Commons care grounded in the Circular Subsidiarity and, more broadly, the Civil Economy paradigm.
L’articolo affronta la tensione tra profitto e scopo delle imprese, proponendo un framework integrato tra Economia Aziendale, Economia Civile e Dottrina Sociale della Chiesa.
2025 © The Economy of Francesco Foundation | All Rights Reserved | Powered by TeamDev Ecosystem
